Jump to content
IGNORED

The Financial Market - Can I Scream Now?


Ken H.

Recommended Posts

Bill, it might also be worth considering what each adds to society.

 

The Celebs made their millions bringing happiness and joy in the form of arts and entertainment. A bad movie looses money, and some folks waste time, but no real harm.

 

The heads of GM are responsible for quite a few jobs under them. Their decisions don't as much generate happiness for the employees. Who loves their job right?. But the decisions do have possible negative impacts. Bad decisions can result in plant closings. There is impacts to other companies, suppliers to GM, as well. I don't envy that job, even with the pay that goes with it.

 

Not saying wrong or right to either role. Just that everything we do impacts the welfare of others. Good decisions made by a exec at GM may very well make more of a positive impact to our society than sending half their salary to charity.

Link to comment
Ken, can you give us some examples of successful, enduring socialist countries?
I didn't say "socialist countries", I said "socialistic model." A number of European countries come to mind, and the EU seems to be on quite the up-tick these days, but the better examples I'd sight are Eastern cultures that have survived, flourished even, for 1000s of years.

 

I've never advocated a total socialist model. It is just as bad as a total capitalist model.

Link to comment
I too am looking for government to solve all that is wrong with my life...
Certianlly not what I for one am advocating. As a matter of fact the word "government" is no where in my posts.
Link to comment

I'd sight are Eastern cultures that have survived, flourished even, for 1000s of years.

 

Ken, "Eastern" is a bit vague. Eastern Asia? The places I'm most familiar with don't have 1000s of year stable pasts. Some parts of the culture remain constant, sure, but their system of government and economic system have changed drastically.

 

Do you have a specific place or society in mind?

 

The EU as of late could be a better idea, but WWII wasn't that long ago, and the German's didn't have a very popular socioeconomic system did they? And didn't the EU start because the independent countries wanted/needed to unite on an economic level to compete?

 

If anything the fact that countries in the EU still have the rich histories and cultures that they do even after WWII is a good sign that people will and do persevere.

Link to comment
I've never advocated a total socialist model. It is just as bad as a total capitalist model.

 

So, where is that line drawn Ken? And who has the authority to draw it?

 

From much of what you've said, and others have alluded to, it could well be that if you're that unhappy with/in this country....

wave.gif

Good luck, write when you find work! lmao.gif

j/k my friend.

Link to comment

Hey Ken

 

Maybe things aren't has bad as you were told.

 

http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/i...=22&sp=true

 

 

"We've seen significant improvements in poverty. The percent of those with low income has gone down, education has increased, life expectancy has increased," Suzman said.

 

"the average net worth of older Americans -- those 65 or older -- has increased almost 80 percent over the past 20 years."

 

"while the proportion of people with incomes below the poverty line fell to 9 percent in 2006, down from 15 percent in 1974,"

 

 

This is the country I live in.

 

Gettin better all the time.

 

Long live "The Great Experiment"

 

Whip

Link to comment
russell_bynum

"the average net worth of older Americans -- those 65 or older -- has increased almost 80 percent over the past 20 years."

 

Yeahbut...in Ken's model, increasing net worth is just a sign of greedy, no-good, screw all of you, taking candy from babies, EverythingThatIsWrongWithThisPlanet.

 

Those damn greedy old people.

Link to comment
DavidEBSmith

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...