Jump to content

Is this some knid of twisted justice/karma???


Recommended Posts

Police say McAllister was attempting to buy drugs and Cotto attempted to rob him. Cotto's death was ruled a homicide. Police say McAllister was a casualty of self-defense.


How is this? To me they got it backwards.


Cotto is trying to rob McAllister, McAllister tries NOT to be robbed. It seems that McAllister was defending himself, thus he killed Cotto in self defense and his death was a homicide.


In the end they were both comitting an illegal transaction. Tally: two dead, no victims.




Link to comment

I don't care how it wound up or who is to blame for each other's death. Natural selection at work as far as I am concerned, better them than some other innocent member of society.

Link to comment


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Create New...