Ken H. Posted October 18, 2007 Posted October 18, 2007 What do you call the style of hose clamp that is used on the new hexheads - air intake to throttle body, and throttle body to intake manifold flange? And where can one get the correct tool for loosening and re-tightening them?
Ken H. Posted October 20, 2007 Author Posted October 20, 2007 Anybody know what this type of clamp is correctly called?
R12Dave Posted October 20, 2007 Posted October 20, 2007 My CD-Rom Service Manual calls the tool "pliers 13 1 512."
BigAdv Posted October 20, 2007 Posted October 20, 2007 This type of clamp is typical to C/V joint boots, the tool looks like a pair of pliers with a tooth sticking out from each jaw, you should be able to find at any good auto parts store. Earl
Ken H. Posted October 20, 2007 Author Posted October 20, 2007 My CD-Rom Service Manual calls the tool "pliers 13 1 512." That helps! The full number is then 90 886 13 1 512 = "Pliers Intake" BUT, it is $US204 from MAX BMW. Yikes! There must be some generic name for this type of clamp and its tool...
Ken H. Posted December 9, 2007 Author Posted December 9, 2007 I finally track down these things - They are a Oetiker Product Group 168. Oetiker's tool for this size is their number 14100030. So far I haven't found any place in the US that sells it though...
KDeline Posted December 10, 2007 Posted December 10, 2007 Probably a dumb question but why not use a regular hose clamp if you have to? BTW I had such a massive backfire when I first got the bike it blew off the tube between the throttle body and head. I was able to unclamp it and reclamp it with a large chanel lock plier. PITA but it worked that time for me but I think I got lucky.
Ken H. Posted December 10, 2007 Author Posted December 10, 2007 These clamps are a bit narrower than the standard off the shelf hose clamps. 7mm wide. Standard clamps won't fit in the groove of the rubber boot/tube.
Mudman Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 Ken, Check the Snap-On man. He was able to supply this plier to our project. The Snap-On tool looked and worked exactly the same as the BMW tool.
Ken H. Posted December 11, 2007 Author Posted December 11, 2007 Ken, Check the Snap-On man. He was able to supply this plier to our project. The Snap-On tool looked and worked exactly the same as the BMW tool. Do you happen to know the Snap-on number? I'm working at a bit of a handicap as I've not seen the actual correct tool yet.
JonM Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 Ken H., these are the same clamps that BMW uses on S54 and S62 M car engines. I have 2 of the BMW tools and they work nice. An alternative, for much less money, is Lisle part number 30500, about $20. It works, but not quite as well. For the price difference, it is worth it.
JonM Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 Here is a link: http://www.sjdiscounttools.com/lis30500.html
Mudman Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 Sorry Ken. I don't have the number, a co-worker bought the tool. As I recall it was around $70.00. Works like a champ, but like mentioned by JonM the Lisle tool might be the better deal given the few times you will need to use this tool.
johnlt Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 I haven't checked but I think the old airhead air intake hose clamps are narrow and may work. I think they are <$5 and even have the BMW logo on them.
Ken H. Posted December 11, 2007 Author Posted December 11, 2007 An alternative, for much less money, is Lisle part number 30500, about $20. It works, but not quite as well. For the price difference, it is worth it. Thanks. As Murphy would have it, an hour before I read this I tracked down a supplier of the official Oetiker 14100030 tool and ordered it. $52.80. Still beats BMW's $204 though! For anyone else's reference: EFC International 1940 Craighshire Rd. St. Louis, MO 63146 314.434.2902
Ken H. Posted January 8, 2008 Author Posted January 8, 2008 Got the tool, here it is. Their shipped part number was 14002121-TLQ. $US52.80
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.