Joe Frickin' Friday Posted April 16, 2010 Share Posted April 16, 2010 Sebastien Buemi's front wheels separate from car during a braking event (breaking event?) in China GP practice session. video here. Wowie. Article here. Link to comment
David Posted April 16, 2010 Share Posted April 16, 2010 You could see that he still couldn't resist turning the wheel as he headed toward the fence. Instinct took over. Link to comment
Firefight911 Posted April 16, 2010 Share Posted April 16, 2010 Uhh, well, errr, ummm, . . . . . sorry? Link to comment
russell_bynum Posted April 16, 2010 Share Posted April 16, 2010 I hate it when that happens. Link to comment
AviP Posted April 16, 2010 Share Posted April 16, 2010 That is just ridiculous. I mean, I know it's cutting edge tech and all that, but gimme a break! That is being way to stingy on the hub, saving rotational mass I presume. Your post title is 100% on the money. Link to comment
upflying Posted April 16, 2010 Share Posted April 16, 2010 Engineering is one part of the suspension design. Who manufactured the part to the engineering specs? Lots of finger pointing I reckon. Me thinks all this stuff is titanium and/or carbon fiber. Trick stuff is always used in the F1 level. Oh well, shyt happens. Link to comment
Lone_RT_rider Posted April 16, 2010 Share Posted April 16, 2010 Engineering is one part of the suspension design. Who manufactured the part to the engineering specs? Lots of finger pointing I reckon. On parts of this caliber there is usually a full print layout with every dimension being inspected along with a material cert (certification) that accompanies it. If there are minimum requirements for functionality, a complete test report also accompanies the individual part. Now I am not saying this absolutely is the case, but I can imagine this would be the standard practice. Link to comment
Joe Frickin' Friday Posted April 16, 2010 Author Share Posted April 16, 2010 Engineering is one part of the suspension design. Who manufactured the part to the engineering specs? Lots of finger pointing I reckon. Me thinks all this stuff is titanium and/or carbon fiber. Trick stuff is always used in the F1 level. Oh well, shyt happens. My understanding is that it's mostly CF, which is why the hub tethers are required: unlike metal, CF tends to shatter (rather than simply bending) when overstressed. As the article noted, in this case the tethers connected to the parts the broke, which is why the wheels were able to completely part company with the chassis. Link to comment
philbytx Posted April 16, 2010 Share Posted April 16, 2010 Easy Peasy one that! Chinese parts innit Link to comment
BeniciaRT_GT Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 Yea, I just watched that part of practice yesterday morning (Formula 1 may be my most favorite TV watching, but it is still a multi day proccess lasting days into the next week to get through a race weekend!) You know its big when you are alone and yell explitives at the top of your lungs! I just couldn't belive how violent that was! This is also why I'm not a fan of CF on airplanes. It either works or it doesn't. It is one or the other with no partial or pending failures. As to trying to steer I saw that right away, and although I partially see why he might try that, you'll see the more expirienced guys pull their hands to their chest when contact is imminent. Link to comment
VinnyR11 Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 Crazy stuff. I could hardly believe it when I saw it. At least the crash capsule and safety features worked well. Better that it happens in F1 than MotoGP. Link to comment
Joe Frickin' Friday Posted April 17, 2010 Author Share Posted April 17, 2010 As to trying to steer I saw that right away, and although I partially see why he might try that, you'll see the more expirienced guys pull their hands to their chest when contact is imminent. Years ago I attended a lecture by Bobby Rahal on indy car safety technology, and he mentioned the tendency for drivers to pull their feet back away from the pedals prior to impact. Test-crash footage showed that this is a bad thing to do: if your feet are against the pedals, then the car's crumple zones decelerate your feet [relatively] gently, whereas if you feet are initially pulled back from the pedals, then they crash violently into the pedals after the cockpit has significantly decelerated. It's analogous to having too much slack in your seatbelt. Not sure what to say about hands. I've seen guys doing live-person crash tests in passenger cars, and they do pull their hands back to their chest as you describe. Maybe it's a good thing? :confused: Link to comment
Spike Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 I *think* (without evidence or expertise) it is because people have a tendency to break their wrists and arms if they don't pull their hands back. I believe that you end up using your arms to transfer some of your body's energy to the steering wheel instead of allowing your belts to absorb the energy. Spike Link to comment
upflying Posted April 17, 2010 Share Posted April 17, 2010 Occupant kinematics (based only on actual experience in investigating collisions for 30 years) tends to show impaired drivers suffer less injuries in collisions. My non-scientific conclusion has to do with impaired drivers being less likely to tense up and react to a collision. Basically they just flop around inside the car and don't break anything. Sober drivers see it coming, react and brace for the impending crash and break bones. So if you see a crash coming..just relax. Link to comment
drzep Posted April 18, 2010 Share Posted April 18, 2010 ... they just flop around inside the car and don't break anything. Sober drivers see it coming, react and brace for the impending crash and break bone. I think that is pretty well accepted at this point. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.