Are12C Posted August 11, 2005 Share Posted August 11, 2005 Does anyone know why BMW brake pads are a "must use" on integrated brake systems? I want to upgrade to a sintered pad set for my '03 RT but I keep running into this comment or "not recommended for Integral ABS" comments. Can anyone shed any light on this subject? Link to comment
Beemeroil Posted August 11, 2005 Share Posted August 11, 2005 The cynics in me say they just want to sell you their product. I would advise EBC HH pads. Link to comment
Smoky Posted August 11, 2005 Share Posted August 11, 2005 I've had sintered metal EBC pads on my bike for about 4000 miles now. Lever effort is more firm, brakes feel stronger, and very little brake dust on the front wheel. I'll go back to these when they wear out. They were cheaper too. Link to comment
Boffin Posted August 11, 2005 Share Posted August 11, 2005 The service manager at my dealer reckons after-market pads work fine, they just wear the disc out much faster. May not be the cheap option in the long run. Cya, Andy Link to comment
KMG_365 Posted August 11, 2005 Share Posted August 11, 2005 At $200.00 per new Rotor (over $600.00 for all three with tax and/or shipping), it might be cheaper to wear the softer pads instead of the rotors. The way I understand it the "metallic" pads will use up your rotor wear limit much faster than the recommended ones and require an earlier, much more costly replacement. I've been getting 50-70K miles on my stock pads (granted, a lot of touring miles) which feel fine with a fresh bleed. I am toying with a SS brake line upgrade soon due to the miles they have on them. With two R1150RT's at around 100,000 miles each (an '02 and '03), all six rotors are still well within the wear limits and will probably outlast the bikes when we sell them at 200,000 miles. But of course, YMMV! Link to comment
Are12C Posted August 12, 2005 Author Share Posted August 12, 2005 I spoke with a former BMW dealer tonight and he was unable to offer any more information on this subject. The only reason another rider I spoke with could come up with was if the brake pads were different compounds varying front from rear. While this may be the case, I intend to replace my pads with sintered EBC versions unless someone else can provide any more insight. I greatly appreciate the views expressed thus far. Thanks. Link to comment
Beemeroil Posted August 12, 2005 Share Posted August 12, 2005 Strange that someone would mention the risk of rotor damage from using using non-approved pads might just be a concern. The only people that mention this risk again are those same dealers trying to sell their pads. While this sounds logical I doubt that there is much truth in this risk. At least not in my experience and if it is factor you don't need to buy BMW rotors as the after market has even better ones for less money. Link to comment
AndyS Posted August 15, 2005 Share Posted August 15, 2005 I have used both, and after the EBC's have bedded in, I can't tell the difference - I also keep an eye on my discs, because I spotted some pitting in the rear disc at about the 10000 mile mark. BMW replaced the disc (thank you!). Have not noticed excessive disc wear so far. So at this rate I will have done an awful lot of miles when replacement is due. (At this point I would have thought that the second, third or fourth owner may have to pick up the tab). I bet I will spend more on rear shock absorbers!! AndyS Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.