leikam Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 I am in no doubt that riders the world over will put safety first and welcome the benefits this protective equipment offers. Link to comment
Stormrider Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 I can see it for the GS guys. Link to comment
Lets_Play_Two Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 Neck brace system IMO you can't claim ATGATT without one!!! Link to comment
Huzband Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 I'd never wear it, but now I know what to get Phil for his BD. Link to comment
eakins Posted May 11, 2007 Share Posted May 11, 2007 mx rider use a similar less advanced neck roll currently. looks to be well thought out. with the new 450 bmw enduro, my guess is they'll have a complete mx clothing line. Link to comment
BerryG Posted May 12, 2007 Share Posted May 12, 2007 I swore I would never ever wear a neck brace in my race car, BUT, I finally tried one and now I feel naked with out it. I don't move my head around much in the race car as compared to a bike so I will have wait to pass judgment on such a device for a motorcycle rider. Link to comment
ShovelStrokeEd Posted May 12, 2007 Share Posted May 12, 2007 Probably a significant safety advance. I probably won't get one. I am at the point now where it takes me quite some time to gear up for a ride and I don't even wear all the gear I have. Most of the time, it is jeans, a jacket, gloves, boots and a helmet. I do wear my riding pants on a trip. I wear even less gear when commuting to work. Then it is just a helmet and gloves. 4.4 miles from my house on city streets. Yeah, I know, crap can happen any time or any where. Blah, blah, blah. It's friggin' hot in Florida and I don't feel like changing when I arrive/leave work so its a golf shirt, loafers and dress pants along with helmet and gloves. I would strongly consider one of those for a day's ride when I planned to really push things or a track day. I kinda wonder about this though. A helmet doesn't offer much traction on pavement, how much force is gonna get transmitted to your neck? OK, a high side could land you on your noggin but that thing isn't going to do much about compression injuries. I also kinda wonder about helmet compatability. My RF1000 is cut much higher than my Quantum used to be. Since the axes isn't very far from the edge of the helmet that would have a big effect on the degree of movement allowed. Link to comment
smiller Posted May 12, 2007 Share Posted May 12, 2007 Hopefully this item will be made mandatory in all states for motorcyclists. I don't want to be financially responsible for careless riders who are injured simply because they wanted the 'freedom' of not wearing one. Link to comment
russell_bynum Posted May 12, 2007 Share Posted May 12, 2007 Hopefully this item will be made mandatory in all states for motorcyclists. I don't want to be financially responsible for careless riders who are injured simply because they wanted the 'freedom' of not wearing one. <snicker> Link to comment
NoHeat Posted May 12, 2007 Share Posted May 12, 2007 The video of a Gold-wing doing a crash test that came out several months ago convinced me that neck injuries will kill you if you T-bone a minivan at a typical street speed. So I think neck restraint might make sense for street riding. If it fits with typical armored street jackets, and if it doesn't interfere with head checks, and so on. Link to comment
Green RT Posted May 12, 2007 Share Posted May 12, 2007 At 350 Pounds ($693), this is pretty pricey protection. Link to comment
Lineareagle Posted May 12, 2007 Share Posted May 12, 2007 Hmmm well I used to wear a brace when I played at full back, and unless this is a WHOLE lot better designed and integrated with the helmet and suit, I wouldn't touch it. A lot of this stuff just makes for more injuries, after all when you come off a bike how are you going to hit the ground or objects? They can't possibly predict all the senarios, unlike say a car where they can strap you into the cage and pretty well predict the forces that are going to be exerted on you. I think I'll wait for this to be more available. Body Armour Link to comment
Bob Palin Posted May 12, 2007 Share Posted May 12, 2007 I feel the same way as Ed, quite honestly if people are this obsessed about getting hurt they should stop riding and remove the risk altogether. Link to comment
philbytx Posted May 12, 2007 Share Posted May 12, 2007 Why stop there.....LIFE is risky Link to comment
UA342 Posted May 13, 2007 Share Posted May 13, 2007 I feel the same way as Ed, quite honestly if people are this obsessed about getting hurt they should stop riding and remove the risk altogether. exactly.....There's a point where ATGATT means driving a car. Link to comment
steve.foote Posted May 13, 2007 Share Posted May 13, 2007 Swimming against the grain here, I happen to be very interested in them. Leatt makes the model for BMW, KTM and undoubtedly others in three models. The "club" is $395, the "sport" is $595 and the "pro" is fully carbon fiber coming in at a healthy $995. The difference between the models is the weight of the material used to make them. While riding the dirt bike, I've not felt overwhelmed by the protective gear I wear, including MX boots, hardened knee braces, body armor w/chest and back protection and a race collar. I'll probably replace the race collar with a Leatt neck brace in the next few weeks. On the street, I'm likely to stick to the traditional riders suit, boots, gloves and helmet. But, on dirt, I'm much more likely to take a fall. In my mind, there is no question that a race collar, and particularly the Leatt neck brace, can significantly reduce the risk of a serious neck injury. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.