peb Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 There is a local custom bike shop within a couple of miles of my house that can get me a good price on ME880 tires. Prices are with $5 of a internet supplier listed in another post. His supplier only list V rated tires. My owners manual calls for Z rated tires. Any reason not to buy the V rated tires. My top riding speed 80-85 mph. Link to comment
Scotty Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 You'll be fine with the 880's. They are used by many on this board. They'll outlast many other tires. Link to comment
wolcott Posted July 19, 2006 Share Posted July 19, 2006 The V rated tires are safe to be ridden up to 149 m.p.h. and the Z rated tires are for speeds over 149 m.p.h. Since you won't be going over 149 m.p.h. on your BMW, you are okay to slap those V-rated tires on the bike. Link to comment
Rags Posted July 20, 2006 Share Posted July 20, 2006 The V rated tires are safe to be ridden up to 149 m.p.h. and the Z rated tires are for speeds over 149 m.p.h. Since you won't be going over 149 m.p.h. on your BMW, you are okay to slap those V-rated tires on the bike. There should be a disclaimer for twisties. If you ride a lot of twisties get the z's. Link to comment
Bob Palin Posted July 20, 2006 Share Posted July 20, 2006 There should be a disclaimer for twisties. If you ride a lot of twisties get the z's. Why? Link to comment
Rags Posted July 20, 2006 Share Posted July 20, 2006 So thats a loaded question right?... OK, I'll bite. Softer stickier compound holds the road better and better speed sidewall tread design. BTW, Z rubber cold is like wood. They warm quickly, but on cold winter mornings when starting your commute, they can be slippery. That's one reason you see superbike racers wiggling their tires prior to racing (they're warming them up) Link to comment
DavidEBSmith Posted July 20, 2006 Share Posted July 20, 2006 Mmmm, speed ratings are based on a tire's ability to withstand heat generated from running at certain speeds. Doesn't necessarily have any connection with the stickiness of the compound or the handling quality of the tire. In fact, if you look at the Metzeler catalog, you can find some ME880 sizes that are Z (W) rated, and some Roadtec Z6 sizes that are only V rated. Nobody would ever claim that the ME880s are better twisties tires than the Z6s. Link to comment
ShovelStrokeEd Posted July 20, 2006 Share Posted July 20, 2006 EB has that right. The speed rating has little, if anything, to do with the tread compound. Since an RT won't approach the limit of either, there is no valid reason, other than fashion, not to run a V-rated tire so long as its load rating, a far more important number, matches the weight of the intended bike/rider/passenger/luggage usage. Link to comment
SWB Posted July 20, 2006 Share Posted July 20, 2006 Nobody would ever claim that the ME880s are better twisties tires than the Z6s. You can say that again. I got my Z6's a while ago, and my bike STILL crawls through the twisties. Mountain bikers pass me going uphill. I thought the Z6's would make my RT faster ... Hmm .. maybe Superbike school?? Link to comment
Rags Posted July 20, 2006 Share Posted July 20, 2006 Mmmm, speed ratings are based on a tire's ability to withstand heat generated from running at certain speeds. Doesn't necessarily have any connection with the stickiness of the compound or the handling quality of the tire. In fact, if you look at the Metzeler catalog, you can find some ME880 sizes that are Z (W) rated, and some Roadtec Z6 sizes that are only V rated. Nobody would ever claim that the ME880s are better twisties tires than the Z6s. I was told the term was hysterisis, the ability of the rubber to stay together while spinning. At least that's what they told me when I suffered chipping on a new 880 rear, doing high speeds in 105-110 degree weather for long periods of time. The rubber flew off the cleats. Z rated tires are high hysterisis. Perhaps a by product of this quality is a softer compound. Link to comment
peb Posted July 20, 2006 Author Share Posted July 20, 2006 Mmmm, speed ratings are based on a tire's ability to withstand heat generated from running at certain speeds. Doesn't necessarily have any connection with the stickiness of the compound or the handling quality of the tire. In fact, if you look at the Metzeler catalog, you can find some ME880 sizes that are Z (W) rated, and some Roadtec Z6 sizes that are only V rated. Nobody would ever claim that the ME880s are better twisties tires than the Z6s. I was told the term was hysterisis, the ability of the rubber to stay together while spinning. At least that's what they told me when I suffered chipping on a new 880 rear, doing high speeds in 105-110 degree weather for long periods of time. The rubber flew off the cleats. Z rated tires are high hysterisis. Perhaps a by product of this quality is a softer compound. What is considered high speed for the ME880? 90-100 or 100 +? I also ride for long periods of time at 80-85mph, with the temps being in the 90's around here. Link to comment
BFish Posted July 20, 2006 Share Posted July 20, 2006 Mmmm, speed ratings are based on a tire's ability to withstand heat generated from running at certain speeds. Doesn't necessarily have any connection with the stickiness of the compound or the handling quality of the tire. In fact, if you look at the Metzeler catalog, you can find some ME880 sizes that are Z (W) rated, and some Roadtec Z6 sizes that are only V rated. Nobody would ever claim that the ME880s are better twisties tires than the Z6s. I was told the term was hysterisis, the ability of the rubber to stay together while spinning. At least that's what they told me when I suffered chipping on a new 880 rear, doing high speeds in 105-110 degree weather for long periods of time. The rubber flew off the cleats. Z rated tires are high hysterisis. Perhaps a by product of this quality is a softer compound. What is considered high speed for the ME880? 90-100 or 100 +? I also ride for long periods of time at 80-85mph, with the temps being in the 90's around here. then you need the ME 990's for 90* weather........... only kidding. Link to comment
Bob Palin Posted July 20, 2006 Share Posted July 20, 2006 What is considered high speed for the ME880? 90-100 or 100 +? I also ride for long periods of time at 80-85mph, with the temps being in the 90's around here. "A friend" of mine has run his 880s at 100+ for hours in the more remote parts of the NV and UT deserts carrying plenty of weight and they don't seem to have any problems. (This statement purely for the purpose of demonstrating one possibile use of the 880, no actual incident is represented or implied) Link to comment
Rags Posted July 20, 2006 Share Posted July 20, 2006 Mmmm, speed ratings are based on a tire's ability to withstand heat generated from running at certain speeds. Doesn't necessarily have any connection with the stickiness of the compound or the handling quality of the tire. In fact, if you look at the Metzeler catalog, you can find some ME880 sizes that are Z (W) rated, and some Roadtec Z6 sizes that are only V rated. Nobody would ever claim that the ME880s are better twisties tires than the Z6s. I was told the term was hysterisis, the ability of the rubber to stay together while spinning. At least that's what they told me when I suffered chipping on a new 880 rear, doing high speeds in 105-110 degree weather for long periods of time. The rubber flew off the cleats. Z rated tires are high hysterisis. Perhaps a by product of this quality is a softer compound. What is considered high speed for the ME880? 90-100 or 100 +? I also ride for long periods of time at 80-85mph, with the temps being in the 90's around here. It was years ago in the Sonoran desert, I was averaging 95 -100. I'm sure the state of the art is a lot better today. I'm probably going to put an 880 rear on mine since I don't like the wear warning on the Z6 (there ain't none). The 880's are a rated V. Properly inflated Link to comment
peb Posted July 21, 2006 Author Share Posted July 21, 2006 I have been running Z6's on the bike and like you said there is no wear warning. I like the Z6 and have had no problems with them and would recommend them as an excellant tire. However, with my daily commute on the bike and a long distance ride or two, I need more mileage. I have ordered the ME880's and they will be mounted on Saturday. Link to comment
DavidEBSmith Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 like you said there is no wear warning. $3.34 at Amazon.com Link to comment
Rags Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 like you said there is no wear warning. $3.34 at Amazon.com What is that? an enima probe? It's no good when your steel belts are showing..... Link to comment
timmr Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 I'm thinking that the gauge should keep you from being in a posistion where the steel belts are showing. A penny works too. Link to comment
Joe Frickin' Friday Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 I'm thinking that the gauge should keep you from being in a posistion where the steel belts are showing. A penny works too. A Z6 rear tire doesn't really have any tread grooves on the centerline; it's really difficult to measure centerline rubber thickness, unless you've got a really good visual memory of what the original tire profile looked like. Link to comment
leikam Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 it's really difficult to measure centerline rubber thickness You could measure the arc of the tire from edge to edge. A new tire will be "longer" than a worn one. Get some reference points, take non-centerline wear into account, and you could probably make a pretty good guess. Easier than pulling the tire off and measuring actual thickness anyway... Link to comment
Joe Frickin' Friday Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 it's really difficult to measure centerline rubber thickness You could measure the arc of the tire from edge to edge. A new tire will be "longer" than a worn one. Get some reference points, take non-centerline wear into account, and you could probably make a pretty good guess. Easier than pulling the tire off and measuring actual thickness anyway... it would be tough to correlate a difference between new/used arc measurements with just how much rubber is remaining on the cords, especially since the thickness of rubber on a new tire is unknown. Certainly it can be done if you're willing to do a lot of investigation and calculation and estimation, which all goes back to what I said: it's really difficult to measure centerline rubber thickness. Link to comment
Rags Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 Mmmm, speed ratings are based on a tire's ability to withstand heat generated from running at certain speeds. Doesn't necessarily have any connection with the stickiness of the compound or the handling quality of the tire. In fact, if you look at the Metzeler catalog, you can find some ME880 sizes that are Z (W) rated, and some Roadtec Z6 sizes that are only V rated. Nobody would ever claim that the ME880s are better twisties tires than the Z6s. Sticky has nothing to do with rating? Hmmmmmmmmmmm. Link to comment
WildR1150RT Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 Except now you are attempting to compare race tires with street tires, Kind of like comparing racing tires for cars and standard street tires. Diffrent animals, diffrent price, diffrent design in process/ material. Link to comment
leikam Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 Here's a page explaining speed ratings in the way that I've always understood them. There could well be a corrolation between top speed and stickiness in that bikes which are capable of going 150mph tend to be sporty enough that their riders also demand good cornering feel. A drag racer who might need a high speed racing might also appreciate as much traction as he can get from his tires. On the other hand, Pirelli makes a Diablo tire for the Burgman (160/60R14) that has an "R" rating -- good to 106mph. Do you think Pirelli would use the "Diablo" brand on a significantly lower performing tire? Perhaps our resident Burgman expert has some idea of their stickiness. Link to comment
Rags Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 Here's a page explaining speed ratings in the way that I've always understood them. There could well be a corrolation between top speed and stickiness in that bikes which are capable of going 150mph tend to be sporty enough that their riders also demand good cornering feel. A drag racer who might need a high speed racing might also appreciate as much traction as he can get from his tires. On the other hand, Pirelli makes a Diablo tire for the Burgman (160/60R14) that has an "R" rating -- good to 106mph. Do you think Pirelli would use the "Diablo" brand on a significantly lower performing tire? Perhaps our resident Burgman expert has some idea of their stickiness. I read the tech on tire rack. It seems to me to says little. It tells of the procedure of the test. Are the tires spun til failure? What constitutes failure. It seems they may be looking for the ability of the tire to hold together under clinical conditions & may be a relative guide to wear (if they measure it then), but the writeup doesn't indicate that. After reading that I don't think it has much value beyond a shopping guide. Z, W, & Y tires are referred to as performance tires - accurately or not. Performance takes into account a lot more than the test. The ability to hold the road, siping to avert aqua planing and real life tire wear. I posted the pic to indicate that stickiness matters (at the cost of wear). When I suggested that if the original poster did twisties frequently, he would be better served with a Z rated tire. BTW racing tires are of the same family, they're simply altered street compound with focused use in their design. I don't mean to get into a pissing contest, but I haven't learned anything new yet. Link to comment
Joe Frickin' Friday Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 When I suggested that if the original poster did twisties frequently, he would be better served with a Z rated tire. The Metzeler ME880 tire has a reputation for lasting well over 10K miles. It's available in a Z-rated version, and in a version that is not Z-rated. Are you saying the Z-rated version offers more traction? Link to comment
David Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 As has been pointed out, it's not about traction. It's not about top speed, either. It's about SUSTAINED top speed. I've used H-rated tires on the track, for goodness sake, and they have just as much traction as the Z-rated sister tire. Link to comment
Paul Mihalka Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 The Metzeler ME880 tire has a reputation for lasting well over 10K miles. It's available in a Z-rated version, and in a version that is not Z-rated. I don't know of any Metzeler ME880 that comes Z rated. Some in older bike sizes are H rated, most I've seen are V rated. They com in belted ("B" in the size) or radial ("R") construction. Link to comment
leikam Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 I haven't learned anything new yet. Do let us know when you have. Link to comment
DavidEBSmith Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 I don't know of any Metzeler ME880 that comes Z rated. According to their current on-line tire guide, they make ME880s in 120/70 ZR-18, 120/70 ZR-19, 210/50 ZR-17, 180/55 ZR-18. Plus there's a 200/50 R-18 that's W rated (to 170 mph). Link to comment
Paul Mihalka Posted July 21, 2006 Share Posted July 21, 2006 I don't know of any Metzeler ME880 that comes Z rated. According to their current on-line tire guide, they make ME880s in 120/70 ZR-18, 120/70 ZR-19, 210/50 ZR-17, 180/55 ZR-18. Plus there's a 200/50 R-18 that's W rated (to 170 mph). Good news! But I don't know if any are current BMW sizes... Link to comment
Joe Frickin' Friday Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 I've used H-rated tires on the track, for goodness sake, and they have just as much traction as the Z-rated sister tire. Yeah, that's kind of what I was getting at: it would be weird if two Me880 tires had two different traction properties - especially when their catalog only gives one traction rating for each model of tire (regardless of whether it's Z-rated or not). Link to comment
David Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 Furthermore, some of the highest speed-rated tires aren't sticky at all. Link to comment
WildR1150RT Posted July 22, 2006 Share Posted July 22, 2006 BTW racing tires are of the same family, they're simply altered street compound with focused use in their design. I don't mean to get into a pissing contest, but I haven't learned anything new yet. Lets see, if you change the compound and design, you have the same family, I guess my daughters VW is a Porsche GT4 in the waiting.. Here is a link that also talks about the difrences of tires, compounds, ratings and even the diffrences between race and street. http://www.sportrider.com/tech/tires/ Link to comment
Rags Posted July 23, 2006 Share Posted July 23, 2006 BTW racing tires are of the same family, they're simply altered street compound with focused use in their design. I don't mean to get into a pissing contest, but I haven't learned anything new yet. Lets see, if you change the compound and design, you have the same family, I guess my daughters VW is a Porsche GT4 in the waiting.. Here is a link that also talks about the difrences of tires, compounds, ratings and even the diffrences between race and street. http://www.sportrider.com/tech/tires/ My Cayenne is built by VW.... Hmmmm Family... Link to comment
flyingreg Posted July 23, 2006 Share Posted July 23, 2006 Nobody would ever claim that the ME880s are better twisties tires than the Z6s. But some may argue they are just as good. My experience has been the 880's held just as good on the same bike, same surfaces, and same conditions. Others may have different experiences, but for me, the 880's worked every bit as good as the Z6's they replaced and I got twice the mileage from the 880's. Link to comment
Rags Posted July 24, 2006 Share Posted July 24, 2006 Nobody would ever claim that the ME880s are better twisties tires than the Z6s. But some may argue they are just as good. My experience has been the 880's held just as good on the same bike, same surfaces, and same conditions. Others may have different experiences, but for me, the 880's worked every bit as good as the Z6's they replaced and I got twice the mileage from the 880's. A german bike magazine agrees with you and now so do I (as a result of their comparisons) Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.